On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 20:42 +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:58 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: <snip> > > However most of the team think this is the better way to allocate the > > given rooms. So I'm asking you guys, what do you think? Can you cope with something > > like this? > > I can't see anyone else in a great rush to reply (or maybe they > responded off list), so I might as well chime in :-) I didn't respond because I won't be there - it's up to those who will be working there to make their opinions known. <snip> > For the primary talk room we will need a location for: > (A) Primary camera, usually pointed at the speaker > (B) Audience camera(s) (near the front, perhaps pointing down towards > the audience). > (C) Camera for slides. Usually fixed, set to point at the projector > screen. <snip> "We" have a VGA-DV capture device for slides (used successfully at FOSDEM). Holger may be able to (or may already have got) buy another for a secondary talk room. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings All the simple programs have been written, and all the good names taken.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part