also sprach Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> [2014-09-21 03:51 +0200]: > We announced the first batch of accepted talks early on because > CfP response was coming in *very* slow. We feared we would end up > with ~80 slots and... ~20 talks. That would clearly not be good. Why not? 20 good talks would be much better than 80 mediocre talks, IMHO. It's not like we (the attendees) won't be able to use the time wisely otherwise! Our selection criteria should be based on relevance, interest, and quality in terms of speaker knowledge and preparation (as I said, we need not select for presentation skills). We should not aim to fill the slots, IMHO, that's wasted resources (and if only on behalf of the video team). Only if we get more submissions than slots, then we'll need to start selecting according to what we think will make our conference super interesting. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)