[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o



On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org> [2013.08.27.0804 +0200]:
> > No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic this
> > doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even when I
> > won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in later (when
> > debconf comes back to europe) and I want to read the archives then.
> 
> In that case, discussions on the list will be limited to an abstract
> level, and to the input of those parents who don't care about how much
> the Web gets to know about their kids. Those parents who exercise care
> in not predefining their kids' online personae will not participate in
> the same way they would if they'd know that anything they say will be
> read only by a closed circle of people.
> 
> How about making archives non-public but only accessible to
> subscribers?

Parents who are concerned about this should assume that the archives are
going to be available to anyone as it would be trivial for someone to
subscribe and obtain access to the archives. Even if the list isn't
archived, someone could still subscribe, and privately archive the
messages.

We shouldn't give parents a false sense of security.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      http://www.donarmstrong.com

The attackers hadn't simply robbed the bank. They had carried off
everything portable, including the security cameras, the carpets, the
chairs, and the light and plumbing fixtures. The conspirators had
deliberately punished the bank, for reasons best known to themselves,
or to their unknown controllers. They had superglued doors and
shattered windows, severed power and communications cables, poured
stinking toxins into the wallspaces, and concreted all of the sinks
and drains. In eight minutes, sixty people had ruined the building so
thoroughly that it had to be condemned and later demolished.
 -- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p4

Reply to: