Re: [Debconf-team] Wiki spam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Or http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ReCAPTCHA
just sayin...
On 02/10/2011 01:03 AM, Brian Gupta wrote:
> How many users are registered overall? I'm wondering if we need to go
> to a manual user approval process, but that wouldn't work if the scale
> is too high.
>
> -Bria
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Moray Allan <moray@sermisy.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Richard Darst <rkd@zgib.net> wrote:
>>> If you look at RecentChanges
>>> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
>>> you'll see the spam attack on our wiki has picked up.
>>
>> There *is* a maths test box on the account creation page. Maybe the
>> automated systems added support for its format by now? (But it might
>> also just be that they're paying people to help them spam.)
>>
>> --
>> Moray
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debconf-team mailing list
>> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
>> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=mUYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: