On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 04:52:32PM +0000, Moray Allan wrote: > As I understand it, the original reason for not having the sponsor > pack publicly linked was different: it was thought useful to be able > to know who had requested copies, and therefore who to keep in contact > with about sponsorship. > > Of course, on this count too there's a trade-off, as it's possible > that this benefit would be outweighed by having the sponsor pack more > immediately accessible. According to my very humble experience of talking with *potentially* interested sponsors as DPL in the last few months of sponsor chasing, I believe the drawbacks of not having the material linked overcomes the tracking benefit. I had to exchange emails with various people asking "where is the sponsoring brochure" and get back to them. That is perfectly fine on my side (if there is a benefit), but it is easy to imagine that less motivated potential sponsors simply didn't bother to mail and just went away. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature