[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf11-localteam] T-Shirt decision!



+1 for this design http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/File:V2pdc11.svg

2011/5/25 Amar Cosic <amar.cosic@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:35 AM, vedran <valajbeg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> 6 and 7 are great but 7. doesn't have official DebConf 11 logo.
>>
>> this set is also great: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/File:V2pdc11.svg
>> first on the right and white one under it are great as primary shirts
>> for Attendee shirts.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Velimir Iveljic
>> <velimir@foolcontrol.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As we approach this years DebConf, stuff like deciding on the T-Shirt
>> > design needs to be done :)
>> >
>> > The proposed designs are here:
>> > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf11/T-Shirts
>> >
>> > It would be best, if all of you just say here, which ones you like
>> > (pick 2 or 3 max) so we can narrow the choice down, since there's too
>> > many to choose from now!
>> > Also suggest a color for each of these:
>> >
>> > * Attendee: to-be-decided
>> > * Video team: to-be-decided
>> > * Volunteer: to-be-decided'
>> >
>> > Thank you for your help and i hope we can make everyone happy about
>> > with our final choice!
>> >
>> >
>> > Velimir
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Debconf11-localteam mailing list
>> > Debconf11-localteam@lists.debconf.org
>> > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf11-localteam
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debconf11-localteam mailing list
>> Debconf11-localteam@lists.debconf.org
>> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf11-localteam
>
> 7 is OK by me too. Also  no 6 from alternate designs
>
> --
> Amar Ćosić
> amar.cosic@gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf11-localteam mailing list
> Debconf11-localteam@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf11-localteam
>
>

Reply to: