Re: [Debconf-team] talks team reportback (and block on meeting results)

[Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>]

I agree on the huge-ness of emails, its hard for me to keep up :).   
The way I see it would be to do it like this, like was Ana was saying  
but perhaps in softer language ;)

- "accept" the ones we marked as accepted last night, those will go in  
the main rooms as planned

- instead of "rejecting" the rest, we encourage them to lead those  
sessions as part of the unconference

.hc

On Jun 3, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:

> These emails are *huge* and the entry cost of reading them slows down
> participation from other people.
>
> After reading them, I feel dkg wants to make the talk selection less
> strict and more inclusive. I second that.
>
> Ana countered with ideas about making it even more strict than what
> the current talks team have been working on. I don't think that's
> acceptable without re-doing the whole process. And I don't think this
> is the time to change to a more stricter criteria. Either we take
> dkg's proposal or we go for what was decided last night.
>
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The arc of history bends towards justice.     - Dr. Martin Luther  
King, Jr.