hey folks-- I'm hoping to give a reportback from the talks team later this weekend, as i offered in the meeting today. I also want to reiterate a call for help if anyone else wants to review talks. If you can even review a dozen talks, please reply here and we'll try to get you reviewer privs. In addition to trying to touch base with my fellow talks team members, i'm realizing i have a few questions myself about what is needed from us. I've never done this work before, so i'd be curious to know what more experienced people think here: 0) of the three axes of review, one of them "Actuality" seems to require that we know the capabilities of the proposer. In many cases, i have no idea if the proposer is actually capable of running the proposed talk. What should i do with "Actuality" in this case? 1) in this process, what is the relationship between reviewing talks, scheduling/placing talks, and accepting talks? that is, I'd love to tell people "your talk is accepted", but i don't want to do that when i don't know if we can accomodate them. Can i get some feedback from the venue folks about how to coordinate this? Thanks for any ideas or feedback y'all have. I'd be happy to learn from past experience but i don't have much to draw from myself. --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature