Ana Guerrero dijo [Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:42:55PM +0100]: > (...) I don't have a strong stand regarding your proposal of the three meetings :) > Also, what about the bid of Quito, Ecuador? If we set a deadline in the past > to present bid and it is over, then I think it should be rejected. > If not, how do you people feel about it? Quito sounds interesting... Although, yes, I am inclined to set it aside for a possible future DebConf. Yes, timing for the presentation does matter, but it is far more important for me the fact we (neither as in "the DebConf team" or "the quite-involved-in-Debian people group" don't know anybody not only from Quito, but from all of Ecuador. The proposal looks interesting... But we do want at least the localteam head to have been already immersed into another DebConf. Not only so that this person (or group of people) knows what type of work and problems to expect, but for the team to know who this person they will be working with is. José's enthusiasm is a very good indicative, and I trust him fully on this. For the record, I know of two people who are in the process of moving from Mexico to Ecuador, precisely because of the advantages he quotes. I would welcome Quito to bid for DebConf 11 - Yes, even if it is to be in the same continent. After all, our continent-hopping tradition is not in the Debian Constitution, is it? Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Attachment:
pgps8urfwZbcx.pgp
Description: PGP signature