[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Debconf-team] [sponsors@debconf.org: [rt.debconf.org #513] my photo on your DebCon8 site]



Looks like his original mail may not have got through to dc-team. Can
somebody in .ar talk to him please?

Thanks,

----- Forwarded message from "info@asadoargentina.com" <sponsors@debconf.org> -----

From: "info@asadoargentina.com" <sponsors@debconf.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:38:33 +0000
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Reply-To: sponsors@debconf.org
Subject: [rt.debconf.org #513] my photo on your DebCon8 site 
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: rt.debconf.org
RT-Ticket: rt.debconf.org #513
Managed-by: RT 3.6.1 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
RT-Originator: info@asadoargentina.com
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 70.103.162.29 (deferred)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_30,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)


Fri Jan 04 20:38:33 2008: Request 513 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by info@asadoargentina.com
       Queue: Sponsorship
     Subject: my photo on your DebCon8 site
       Owner: Nobody
  Requestors: info@asadoargentina.com
      Status: new
 Ticket <URL: https://rt.debconf.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=513 >


Hi,

I can't seem to get a reply from debconf-team@lists.debconf.org regarding
a photo of mine that is being used without permission nor credit.

Page: http://debconf8.debconf.org/about_mdq.shtml.en /
Photo: http://debconf8.debconf.org/images/bife_de_chorizo.jpg

Proper source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/asadoarg/494017584/

The photo is currently "all rights reserved"

Regards,
www.asadoargentina.com






----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
 whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
 Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html


Reply to: