[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: COVID and probabilities



Le 2025-08-02 03:47, gregor herrmann a écrit :
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 14:11:23 +0200, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:

There must certainly be good reasons that explain why an overwhelming majority of health authorities around the world relaxed or dropped their isolation policies.

For health authorities? Probably lack of political support.

Not sure about that one, they were already used to lacking political support anyway and in many countries they are pretty good at resisting undue (and sometimes due...) political pressure.

Subtitle: How politicies cave in to Business wanting workers back at factories and offices (no matter if they are sick or contagious for others) and right-wing lunatics (carrying Russian flags on their anti-vax demos) in the vain hope to keep their votes.

There is a good potential for many discussions in that subtitle ;)

The current RTO and sick leave reduction trends are indeed problematic. But missing a few days of work that will still be there when you are back is not quite the same as missing most of a social event that you are not sure to be able to attend again soon if ever, and for which you made sacrifices (e.g. money or vacation days).

And lobbies, politicians and various crackpots (including some actual scientists) contributed a lot to the loss of trust in scientific authorities that occured in most places in the last few years. Most people can't understand the massive uncertainties in the current scientific knowledge of the disease, there is a lot of disinformation that is sometimes relayed by politicians and "experts", and many people end up with suspicion and a fairly biased perception of risks as a result. And by that I mean the same kind of bias as in the fear of flying, where one is orders of magnitude more likely to die on the road to the airport than on a commercial flight, but they don't even realize that it's that part of their trip that they should fear.

There is a good example of the issues at stake in this article [1], which is a read that I also recommend to the Community Team ;)

[1]: https://theconversation.com/game-theory-explains-why-reasonable-parents-make-vaccine-choices-that-fuel-outbreaks-256975

PS: Talking about science here's an interesting blog post by an Austrian MD summarizing new research on brain damages by COVID-19:
https://allcoronavirusesarebastards.digitalpress.blog/covid-19-strukturelle-schaden-des-gehirns-und-die-kognitiven-fahigkeiten/
(Text in German but the papers are of course in English.)

It's interesting that he acknowledges that one of the hypotheses for the things that contributed to measurable brain damage in people is the effect of lockdowns and isolation policies. Some others are happy to promptly dismiss that as "nah, all these people who pretend they didn't get COVID just got COVID like all the others and they just didn't test or didn't have symptoms, and so that's obviously the COVID that explains all the damage".

Cheers,

--
Julien Plissonneau Duquène


Reply to: