also sprach Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> [2014-09-25 12:13 +0200]:
> I agree with this. We should encourage more technical design
> discussions. What's currently holding up teams to have such
> discussions at Debconf?
- presentation style room setup
- short period of time (45 minutes is hardly enough for in-depth
discussion, is it?)
- the expectation to have it all on video and hence the requirement
to pass around the microphone, which I think hurts natural
exchange in a physical space.
Now, I agree with Wookey that it would be nice to build an
all-inclusive atmosphere for these. And Paul's suggestion might be
worthwhile to pick up. But still, I think telepresence of any form
is going to dampen the amount of discussion/BoF interaction that is
going to happen.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)