Hi, On Friday 09 June 2006 16:51, Christian Perrier wrote: > This is maybe what has been missing this year: more public rationale > about the criteria used by the academic commitee to select talks. But, > of course, this is again about volunteer work and I'd having hard > times making a formal complaint about this. Actually the rationale and the process have been much more public this year. "Problematic talks" also have been discussed on this very list. > Probably another possible improvement direction here. Of course. Allways. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgp81klpQKlfS.pgp
Description: PGP signature