Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media

To: cdwrite@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media
From: "Zhang Weiwu, Beijing" <zhangweiwu@realss.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:37:39 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 4CDE0803.9050708@realss.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 94740449318906@192.168.2.69>
References: <4cdd0ef2.ng3X/fXdn/bmQCLl%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <[🔎] 94740449318906@192.168.2.69>

On 11/12/2010 06:24 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:

But first we have to see a successful run with RESERVE TRACK.
It is unlikely that the successful cdrskin run used that command.
I am not sure about the successful growisofs run.
So the proposed experiment is essential for deciding this question:
Is the sparse timeout to blame or is it the command generally ?


Is there anything you want me to do in order to figure out this?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media
  - From: "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media
Next by Date: Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media
Previous by thread: Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media
Next by thread: Re: First case, check if wodim reliably spoils the optical media
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread