Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
In Run 1 there were several buffer underruns which slowed the DVD recorders
down. In Run 2 the buffer was always at 100% (except for the end of
course) :-).
This seems reasonable, what were the performance numbers for the other
system activity? I'm surprised at the underruns, cdrecord has internal
fifo, and I thought you did, too. With a hacked cdrecord (around a50)
the burn ran almost eight seconds slower, regardless of burn size, and
never dropped below 92% full at the drive, and 70% or so in the fifo.
Hacked how?