[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Track size for the DVD+RW?



Hi!

I have burned the iso image (4683169792 bytes) on the DVD+RW. (The image was already rounded up to the closest 32KB). The dvd+rw-mediainfo output is:

INQUIRY:                [TEAC    ][DV-W516GA       ][C4S2]
GET [CURRENT] CONFIGURATION:
 Mounted Media:         1Ah, DVD+RW
 Media ID:              MCC/A01
 Current Write Speed:   2.4x1385=3324KB/s
 Write Speed #0:        2.0x1385=2770KB/s
GET [CURRENT] PERFORMANCE:
 Write Performance:     2.4x1385=3324KB/s@[0 -> 2295103]
 Speed Descriptor#0:    00/2295103 R@8.0x1385=11072KB/s W@2.4x1385=3324KB/s
READ DVD STRUCTURE[#0h]:
 Media Book Type:       92h, DVD+RW book [revision 2]
 Legacy lead-out at:    2286704*2KB=4683169792
READ DISC INFORMATION:
 Disc status:           complete
 Number of Sessions:    1
 State of Last Session: complete
 Number of Tracks:      1
 BG Format Status:      suspended
READ TRACK INFORMATION[#1]:
 Track State:           complete
 Track Start Address:   0*2KB
 Free Blocks:           0*2KB
 Track Size:            2295104*2KB
FABRICATED TOC:
 Track#1  :             14@0
 Track#AA :             14@2295104
 Multi-session Info:    #1@0
READ CAPACITY:          2295104*2048=4700372992

I wanted to verify the result in my DVD-ROM (Toshiba SD-M1802), but I was able to read only 4683167744 bytes (exactly the image size - 2048). I tried "dd if=/dev/dvdrom bs=2048", "wc -c /dev/dvdrom", "cksum /dev/dvdrom"...

Then I returned this DVD+RW back into my DVD recorder (Teac DV-W516GA) and also tried the to "dd if=/dev/dvdrw bs=2048" and "wc -c /dev/dvdrw". This time it returned 4700372992 bytes (whole media capacity)...

Can anyone tell me what's the difference between "Legacy lead-out" and the "Track Size"? And why the DVD recorder reads the whole media and the DVD-ROM drive doesn't read the entire track?

To burn the image I used both - growisofs 5.12 and cdrecord-ProDVD 2.01. The result was the same. My Linux kernel is 2.4.26 with dvd+rw-tools patch.

Thanks.


Ales



Reply to: