Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Rob Bogus wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >Well, portability in a quality as with my software takes a lot of effort.
> >
> >Speaking for cdrecord, the change not really needed as no writer uses
> >something differnt from lun 0.
> >
> >
> >
> Does this mean that if a real SCSI burner is used with a LUN of >0 it
> doesn't work with your software, or some part of the standard says it
> must be zero, or you have never seen one jumperd for non-zero, or ???
I would call it (close to) impossible to jumper the LUN of such a SCSI
device at all! ;-)
One can imagine burners w/ disc change mechanism, although I've never seen one,
and the LUNs will be hardwired...
Carsten
>
> --
> E. Robert Bogusta
> It seemed like a good idea at the time
Reply to: