Re: cdrecord and scsi-3 compliance
> >> In any case, the low level transport code needs to set the lun bits
> >> if the SCSI level is <= 3.
>
> >Not '<=', but '<'. A.
>
> Well, SCSI-3 did not include this new feature in the beginning,
Define "beginning." First draft or first ratified specification? Can you
really confirm that 3 most significant bits of second byte of command
block were still LUN in first ratified document?
> so
> any firmware that enforces the lun field to be zero for SCSI-3 is broken.
No, it's not. "Recipients *may* check reserved bits, bytes, words or
fields for zero values and report errors if non-zero values are
received."
Reply to: