[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

growisofs problem with non +RW media on Samsung TS-542A



Hi,

I'm running debian/unstable with a 2.6.8.1 kernel and growisofs
5.21.4.10.8-1.  The machine has a Samsung TS-542A. growisofs works
fine for DVD+RW media but refuses to do anything with DVD-R or DVD-RW
media with a 'Wrong medium type' error.

black:/home/mal# dvd+rw-format -blank /dev/hda
* DVD\uffffRW/-RAM format utility by <appro@fy.chalmers.se>, version 4.10.
* 4.7GB DVD-RW media in Sequential mode detected.
* blanking .:-[ PERFORM OPC failed with SK=5h/ASC=30h/ACQ=02h]: Wrong medium type

black:/home/mal# growisofs -dvd-video -Z /dev/hda=ocean.img
Executing 'builtin_dd if=ocean.img of=/dev/hda obs=32k seek=0'
:-[ PERFORM OPC failed with SK=5h/ASC=30h/ACQ=02h]: Wrong medium type

black:/home/mal# dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/hda
INQUIRY:                [TSSTcorp][CD/DVDW TS-H542A][TS01]
GET [CURRENT] CONFIGURATION:
 Mounted Media:         14h, DVD-RW Sequential
 Current Write Speed:   2.0x1385=2760KB/s
 Write Speed #0:        2.0x1385=2760KB/s
GET [CURRENT] PERFORMANCE:
 Write Performance:     4.2x1385=5809KB/s@[0 -> 0]
 Speed Descriptor#0:    00/2295103 R@8.0x1385=11040KB/s W@2.0x1385=2760KB/s
READ DVD STRUCTURE[#10h]:
 Media Book Type:       32h, DVD-RW book [revision 2]
 Legacy lead-out at:    16424665*2KB=33637713920
READ DVD STRUCTURE[#0h]:
 Media Book Type:       32h, DVD-RW book [revision 2]
 Last border-out at:    16424665*2KB=33637713920
READ DISC INFORMATION:
 Disc status:           blank
 Number of Sessions:    1
 State of Last Session: empty
 Number of Tracks:      1
READ TRACK INFORMATION[#1]:
 Track State:           invisible incremental
 Track Start Address:   0*2KB
 Free Blocks:           2298496*2KB
 Track Size:            2298496*2KB
FABRICATED TOC:
 Track#1  :             14@0
 Track#AA :             14@1
 Multi-session Info:    #1@0
READ CAPACITY:          1*2048=2048

-- 
An amateur practices until he gets it right,
A professional practices until she can't get it wrong.



Reply to: