[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1011383: marked as done (RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2022 15:36:16 +0200
with message-id <185a79a6-0d38-29ff-9c48-9993a838c7f5@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011383,
regarding RFS: gcc-sh-elf/4 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1011383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011383
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":

 * Package name    : gcc-sh-elf
   Version         : 4
 * License         : various
 * Vcs             :
https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/toolchains/gcc-sh-elf
   Section         : devel

The source builds the following binary packages:

  gcc-sh-elf - GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
  libnewlib-sh-elf-dev - small ISO C standard library for embedded
SuperH devices

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-sh-elf/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this
command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-sh-elf/gcc-sh-elf_4.dsc

This is just an upload of the existing experimental package to unstable
along with a Standards-Version bump.
It was uploaded to experimental because of a serious regression in GCC
12, but it has since been fixed for the most part and I'm happy to
upload it to unstable now.

Otherwise, I do not believe new test failures deserve additional
attention. I believe the autopkgtests offer very good coverage for this
package; they all pass. Furthermore, I've been able to build carl9170fw
using GCC 12 without a problem. (I'll be resurrecting my RFS for
carl9170fw soon.)

I'll probe the reproducible builds situation soon, but this should not
postpone the migration to GCC 12.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Please push the change in git as well. Uploaded.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: