[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#901584: marked as done (RFS: flameshot/0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1)



Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:37:07 +0200
with message-id <20180615133707.ayorp7xrlciiarms@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#901584: RFS: flameshot/0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #901584,
regarding RFS: flameshot/0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
901584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901584
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-backports@lists.debian.org

  Dear mentors and backports developers,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flameshot" into stretch-backports.

 * Package name    : flameshot
   Version         : 0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1
   Upstream Author : lupoDharkael <izhe@hotmail.es>
 * URL             : https://github.com/lupoDharkael/flameshot/
 * License         : GPL-3+
   Section         : graphics

  It builds those binary packages:

    flameshot  - Powerful yet simple-to-use screenshot software

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/flameshot


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flameshot/flameshot_0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1.dsc

  Git packaging repository:

    https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flameshot (stretch-backports branch)

  Changes since the last upload:

   flameshot (0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
   * Lower debhelper compat to v10 for backport build.

P.S. I feel pretty suprised that current debhelper 11.3.2~bpo9+1 would
conflict with qt5-qmake in Stretch. It would be great if anyone could
help look into this problem.


  Regards,
   Boyuan Yang

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:04:31AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flameshot" into stretch-backports.
> 
>  * Package name    : flameshot
>    Version         : 0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1

It's an update, so it doesn't need to go through NEW, and you got DM rights.
So you should be able to upload it yourself...
I've done it this time, though.

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>    flameshot (0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
>    * Lower debhelper compat to v10 for backport build.
> 
> P.S. I feel pretty suprised that current debhelper 11.3.2~bpo9+1 would
> conflict with qt5-qmake in Stretch. It would be great if anyone could
> help look into this problem.

Apparently there are bugs in qt5-qmake's cross wrapper that were fixed in a
later upload, and that later version is not in Stretch.  Thus, someone would
need to backport that package.  But, as debhelper 10 is fine for flameshot,
that's not an immediate problem.  I also see the Breaks removed in
yet-unreleased version of debhelper -- if I understand right, it's no longer
needed in Buster and that easing backports was considered to be more
important than cross-building backports.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ There's an easy way to tell toy operating systems from real ones.
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Just look at how their shipped fonts display U+1F52B, this makes
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the intended audience obvious.  It's also interesting to see OSes
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ go back and forth wrt their intended target.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: