[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#215379: marked as done (Please remove cache detection for --print-uris)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Aug 2015 23:27:09 +0200
with message-id <20150814212709.GA1919@crossbow>
and subject line Re: Please remove cache detection for --print-uris
has caused the Debian Bug report #215379,
regarding Please remove cache detection for --print-uris
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
215379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=215379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.14
Severity: wishlist

It would be fine if `apt-get --print-uris install <package>' could
work either the package file is in the cache, or maybe the cache could
be ignored with a option.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux abydos 2.4.21 #1 SMP Sun Aug 10 18:23:02 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                      2.3.2-8       GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.3.2-0pre5 GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                 1:3.3.2-0pre5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi

On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:26:20PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> It would be fine if `apt-get --print-uris install <package>' could
> work either the package file is in the cache, or maybe the cache could
> be ignored with a option.

You can add -o Dir::cache::archives=/dev/null to the call and the
download cache for deb files is ignored (as you might have guest, you
can set a different cache directory with this option).

So, I think this bugreport can be closed as done.

btw: There is also 'apt-get download' now which might do what you need
to depending on what the goal was.


Best regards

David Kalnischkies

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: