On Monday 21 October 2013 19:25:48 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:34:52 +0200 Michael Vogt wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:39:06PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > > Meyer wrote: [..] > > > > > Saddly it is not documented in apt.conf(5). Being documented would help > > > in > > > implementations like the one described in #726430. > > > > Looking at #726430 - would it help you if we would simply add the > > discovered proxy as http_proxy to the environment used to fork the > > DPkg::Pre-Invoke scripts? > > I think it would help, as it would transparently make apt-listbugs work > in Lisandro's job environment, without any modification on the > apt-listbugs side. I think that too. Just for the record: you two seems to be far more knowledgeable than me wrt apt stuff. So I *think* you two have the key to solve this problem. Of course, I'm the one with the problem and the "special" set up, so I'm happily volunteering for testing anything you want wrt this bug. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.