Re: libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'
On 2010-08-24 21:53 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 21:48:51 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-08-24 21:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> > New commits:
>> > commit 752295ba101d84b8e3e695621fa41ce9406104e1
>> > Author: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
>> > Date: Tue Aug 24 19:32:36 2010 +0200
>> >
>> > Drop 04_fix_nouveau_bo_new_tile_segfault.diff, applied upstream.
>>
>> This is actually only half correct.
>>
> Damn, sorry about that.
>
>> > - if (flags & NOUVEAU_BO_PIN) {
>> > - ret = nouveau_bo_pin((void *)nvbo, nvbo->flags);
>> > - if (ret) {
>> > -- nouveau_bo_ref(NULL, (void *)nvbo);
>> > -+ nouveau_bo_ref(NULL, (void *)&nvbo);
>> > - return ret;
>>
>> But that one needs to be restored (this path does not exist upstream
>> anymore).
>>
> Can you fix it up? I'll reupload.
Done.
>> BTW, it is now possible to install the experimental
>> xserver-xorg-video-nouveau together with sid's libdrm-nouveau1. :-/
>>
> Yeah, I know :/
> I needed a newer libdrm in sid for intel, and didn't see a way to avoid
> this.
Maybe we should bite the bullet and rename the experimental
libdrm-nouveau package, there is now another reverse dependency
(plymouth) in sid. Alternatively we could bump the symbols version to
2.4.21-1.
Cheers,
Sven
Reply to: