On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:34AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > Also, you could try the new libx11* packages currently in experimental > (2:1.1.1-1 instead the 2:1.1-2 you had when reporting this bug) in case > something got fixed. Even better, please try 2:1.1.2-1, which fixes an event-handling spin that we thought might be related. IIRC we still saw more read calls returning EAGAIN than I can explain, but I currently can't reproduce any high CPU usage conditions with 1.1.2. --Jamey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature