[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#427858: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-ati: no DRI: undefined symbol _glapi_add_dispatch)

Your message dated Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:00:04 +0200
with message-id <20070607010002.GC18239@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Bug#427858: xserver-xorg-video-ati: no DRI: undefined symbol _glapi_add_dispatch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 6.6.192-1
Severity: normal

The output from running LIBGL_DEBUG=VERBOSE glxinfo indicates no direct
rendering and states:

libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so failed
(/usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_add_dispatch)
libGL error: unable to find driver: r300_dri.so


This causes no DRI to be available.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-ati depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.5-10     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core             2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6 X.Org X server --
core server

xserver-xorg-video-ati recommends no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Jun  6, 2007 at 19:50:25 -0500, Adam Dane wrote:

> Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> >This symbol is provided by libGL.so.1 from the libgl1-mesa-glx package,
> >so this error is probably caused by an installation of fglrx.  Can you
> >check this?
> 
> Yes, that was the problem. Sorry about that.
> 
No worries. Closing the bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: