Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:05:14 +0100 with message-id <45D840FA.8000400@ens-lyon.org> and subject line Bug#77069: xnest: MIT-SHM extension wanted has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian BTS Submissions <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: xnest: [wishlist] MIT-SHM support
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:18:50 -0800
- Message-id: <20001114141850.A13011@vitelus.com>
Package: xnest Version: 4.0.1-4 Severity: wishlist Xnest does not appear to support the SHM extension, which is a pitty since it would be an excelent tool for testing programs using XShm, for example using different bit depths than the hosting X server.Attachment: pgpIsbrThX7ue.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 77069-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#77069: xnest: MIT-SHM extension wanted
- From: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:05:14 +0100
- Message-id: <45D840FA.8000400@ens-lyon.org>
Closing this wishlist since I don't think it would ever be fixed. Fortunately, MIT-SHM is supported in Xephyr, which is the recommended alternative to Xnest nowadays anyway. Brice
--- End Message ---