Bug#263877: Various display artifacts in uxterm
- To: 263877-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#263877: Various display artifacts in uxterm
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:12:57 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20041206031257.GB29501@redwald.deadbeast.net>
- Reply-to: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>, 263877-quiet@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20041122202022.GO5781@alcor.net>
- References: <20040806201253.GA18226@saltmine.radix.net> <20040806202904.GL14417@alcor.net> <20040806205719.GA27345@saltmine.radix.net> <20040901094723.GL16490@redwald.deadbeast.net> <20040901155340.GL12770@alcor.net> <20040920193326.GB6579@redwald.deadbeast.net> <20041008232817.GQ19131@redwald.deadbeast.net> <20041102024310.GR28677@alcor.net> <20041117220252.GE25110@redwald.deadbeast.net> <20041122202022.GO5781@alcor.net>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:20:22PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > Does XTerm #196, in xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8, make either of these any better?
[...]
> I can't conveniently install that version of the package; perhaps my test
> was inadvertently invalid. I've just returned from a holiday and don't
> remember what I did. I'll re-test when I'm a bit more caught up.
Any luck on this front?
--
G. Branden Robinson | Every aristocracy that has ever
Debian GNU/Linux | existed has behaved, in all
branden@debian.org | essential points, exactly like a
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | small mob. -- G.K. Chesterton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: