[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

xutils / imake and CrossCompile



Hey All,

I've just upgraded my one of the boxes I work on and found that CrossCompile is now being defined in imake. In the version I was running previously (which I have on another machine) it was not defined is there any reason for this change?


Ta,
dg

xutils versions:
current: xutils         4.3.0-7
previous: xutils         4.2.1-12.1



The test I used to find was:

Test.tmpl
----------------------------------------------------
#include <Imake.cf>
#include <Test.cf>
----------------------------------------------------

Test.cf
----------------------------------------------------
#ifdef CrossCompiling
CROSS_COMPILE = DODAH
#else
#define CrossCompiling          NO
CROSS_COMPILE =
#endif /* CrossCompiling */
----------------------------------------------------

Imakefile
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


and ran the command, with the new version of imake:

/usr/bin/X11/imake -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config -I. -TTest.tmpl

which gave the result

Makefile
----------------------------------------------------
# Makefile generated by imake - do not edit!
# $Xorg: imake.c,v 1.6 2001/02/09 02:03:15 xorgcvs Exp $

# $Xorg: Imake.cf,v 1.4 2000/08/17 19:41:45 cpqbld Exp $

# $XFree86: xc/config/cf/Imake.cf,v 3.81 2003/02/18 16:51:45 tsi Exp $

# Keep cpp from replacing path elements containing i486/i586/i686

CROSS_COMPILE = DODAH
----------------------------------------------------

copying imake from the other machine and doing as above gave:

Makefile
----------------------------------------------------
# Makefile generated by imake - do not edit!
# $Xorg: imake.c,v 1.6 2001/02/09 02:03:15 xorgcvs Exp $

# $Xorg: Imake.cf,v 1.4 2000/08/17 19:41:45 cpqbld Exp $

# $XFree86: xc/config/cf/Imake.cf,v 3.81 2003/02/18 16:51:45 tsi Exp $

# Keep cpp from replacing path elements containing i486/i586/i686

CROSS_COMPILE =
----------------------------------------------------





Reply to: