Bug#224558: marked as done (libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:55:01 -0500
with message-id <20031224225501.GC9663@deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#224558: libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 04:18:53 +0000
>From compudj@krystal.dyndns.org Fri Dec 19 22:18:52 2003
Return-path: <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Received: from relais.videotron.ca (VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca) [24.201.245.36]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXYSc-0003pr-00; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:11:26 -0600
Received: from krystal.dyndns.org ([24.202.168.233])
by VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))
with ESMTP id <0HQ600HLCEA94S@VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for
submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:10:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000)
by krystal.dyndns.org with local; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:10:56 -0500
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:10:56 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Subject: libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Message-id: <[🔎] courier.3FE3CBD0.00006D41@krystal.dyndns.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libxft2
Version: 2.1.2-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Since about 2 weeks, I notice that apt-get wants to remove development
packages in order to install the 2.1.2-5 version of libxft2. These
packages are :
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libglade2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgtkgl2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev
libqt3-mt-dev libxft2-dev qt3-examples
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Krystal 2.4.23-grsec #2 Tue Dec 2 19:47:16 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA
Versions of packages libxft2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.1-13 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-5 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.2.1-14 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-2 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2003 01:21:53 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Wed Dec 24 19:21:52 2003
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZHuA-0005xl-00; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:55:02 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DF1B764117; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:55:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:55:01 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 224558-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#224558: libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages
Message-ID: <20031224225501.GC9663@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] courier.3FE3CBD0.00006D41@krystal.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] courier.3FE3CBD0.00006D41@krystal.dyndns.org>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 224558-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:10:56PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Package: libxft2
> Version: 2.1.2-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid
>=20
> Since about 2 weeks, I notice that apt-get wants to remove development
> packages in order to install the 2.1.2-5 version of libxft2. These
> packages are :
>=20
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> libglade2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgtkgl2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev
> libqt3-mt-dev libxft2-dev qt3-examples
I cannot reproduce this problem. I am running sid.
# apt-get install libxft-dev libglade2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgtkgl2.0-dev li=
bpango1.0-dev libqt3-mt-dev qt3-examples
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
libxft-dev is already the newest version.
libqt3-mt-dev is already the newest version.
The following extra packages will be installed:
libatk1.0-dev libglib2.0-dev libgtkgl2.0-1
Suggested packages:
libglib2.0-doc libgtk2.0-doc libpango1.0-doc
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libatk1.0-dev libglade2-dev libglib2.0-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgtkgl2.0-1 li=
bgtkgl2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev qt3-examples
0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 5484kB of archives.
After unpacking 14.7MB of additional disk space will be used.
libxft-dev doesn't conflict with any of these, except libxft2-dev, from whi=
ch
it was renamed.
If the problem persists, please confirm that you're asking apt to
install the latest versions of these other packages. An "apt-get
dist-upgrade" might be in order, or if you're trying to minimize the
changes to your system, use the command I did.
Closing this report.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | The only way to get rid of a
Debian GNU/Linux | temptation is to yield to it.
branden@debian.org | -- Oscar Wilde
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj/qGUUACgkQ6kxmHytGonylPgCdFPdFKDgs4EvA8SQekusqdALm
lQEAnjiOuh6mAG3rNCnkSh4rEbPA2Zxz
=M0CJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl--
Reply to: