[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#200857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=200857



>                       Debian Bug report logs - #200857
>                 xterm fails to honour dtterm sequence ESC[21t
...
>       allowWindowOps (class AllowWindowOps)
>               Specifies   whether   extended   window    control
>               sequences  (as  used  in  dtterm)  for  should  be
>               allowed.
...
>From: Vivek <vivek@etla.org>
...
>Ok then: assuming this defaults/will default to "false", there's no
>real need to stomp on the sequence handling completely, then, right?

That's my viewpoint - if Brendan adds a "false" to the system app-defaults
file, it would still allow a user to override it and get the features.

Making it return an empty string would be incorrect behavior - if it's
not implemented, it should be parsed & ignored.
-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net




Reply to: