On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:43:33PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > It certainly looks like the best solution I've seen to the problem. Thanks! > It's too bad that we're not likely to get this into policy for woody. > Since non of the display managers are frozen yet (correct?) might we > still be able to implement this "unofficially", presuming we get the > maintainers to all agree on the implementation? Yes, presuming we can. Ryan Murray has some objections but he hasn't mailed the list with them yet. Also, as I understand it, login.app isn't a display manager (though it does some stuff with /etc/inittab which makes me uncomfortable), so the only people affected are {g,k,w,x}dm. -- G. Branden Robinson | It's not a matter of alienating Debian GNU/Linux | authors. They have every right to branden@debian.org | license their software however we http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | like. -- Craig Sanders
Attachment:
pgpci0NNJsl4J.pgp
Description: PGP signature