[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#358254: fix found in bug #358682, reinstalled libxft-dev



Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.8.2-5.1
Followup-For: Bug #358254


Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.8.2-3 (using
.../libxft-dev_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libxft-dev ...
dpkg: warning - unable to delete old directory `/usr/include/X11/Xft':
Directory not empty
Preparing to replace libxft2 2.1.8.2-3 (using
.../libxft2_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libxft2 ...



Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.8.2-3 (using
.../libxft-dev_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libxft-dev ...
dpkg: warning - unable to delete old directory `/usr/include/X11/Xft':
Directory not empty
Preparing to replace libxft2 2.1.8.2-3 (using
.../libxft2_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libxft2 ...

...

that works for me,
apt-get upgrade now possible again.

Thomas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.1
Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libxft-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]      2.3.6-4        GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libfontconfig1-dev        2.3.2-1.1      generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6-dev          2.1.10-2       FreeType 2 font engine, developmen
ii  libx11-dev                6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxft2                   2.1.8.2-5.1    FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxrender-dev            1:0.9.0.2-1    X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  x-dev                     6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 X protocol development files
ii  x11-common                6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii  zlib1g-dev [libz-dev]     1:1.2.3-9      compression library - development

libxft-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: