[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#923974: marked as done (packages.debian.org filelist incorrect (for some archs))

Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +0000
with message-id <61241a709869a_52212ab33d1465c0906d0@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#923974 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #923974,
regarding packages.debian.org filelist incorrect (for some archs)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
923974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
User: www.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertag: packages
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: andreas@fatal.se

Hi Andreas
Thanks for the report. I have created a bug report about it, if you want
to follow you can subscribe to the bug sending a mail to
nnnn-subscribe@bugs.debian.org (being nnnn the bug number).

Kind regards


-------- Mensaje reenviado --------
Asunto: packages.debian.org filelist incorrect (for some archs)
Resent-Date: Sun,  3 Mar 2019 10:17:04 +0000 (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Fecha: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:08:47 +0100
De: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
Para: debian-www@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I happened to look at this page and spotted multiple problems (and it
had your contact information on it):
https://packages.debian.org/sid/arm64/sysvinit-utils/filelist

1. The file list is not correct
   - eg. /usr/sbin/service et.al. are not in the package (anymore since
   several years).
2. It doesn't say with actual version of the package it's showing
   only a vague "<package> in sid" statement so it's not obvious when
   the filelist is outdated information.

Compare this other archs page which seems more up to date:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/sysvinit-utils/filelist

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello,

Bug #923974 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/commit/9186dd45f3ea111b309c580b11674689dd5f2c4d

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test for link on suite level when avoiding duplicates; restore service. (Closes: #923974)

This commit changes the logic of existing code. The author was not sure if the
existing code performed as it should. The '-l' file test on the Contents.gz data
files will not capture symbolic links for suite aliases on the suite level.

Looks at the suite level instead.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/923974

--- End Message ---
Reply to: