[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#147164: marked as done (www.debian.org: DDP: DDP policy is too out of date)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:08:35 +0000
with message-id <5cc1cd73152b5_71e32b1610ef70d0182a4@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #147164 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #147164,
regarding www.debian.org: DDP: DDP policy is too out of date
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
147164: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=147164
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-16
Severity: important

(didn't now where to send this to, we should have a virtual 'debian-ddp'
or 'documentation' package to send the DDP stuff to).

Ok. The current DDP policy is way out of date, this has as a consequence
that there are a number of discrepancies in the published documentation on
how to handle, for example, internationalization extensions.

Some issues that need to be tackled in policy which are currently not there:

- use of CVS in the DDP documentation (this is a must and many documentation
does not follow it)

- how must packages be prepared: one package per document? one for each
translated version?

- layout of documentation in ftp.debian.org/debian/doc (we are not currently publishing
there since it's done with 'byhand' targets in the packages), we need to
remove the byhand targets to properly "control" that section and tell
authors how to publish there

- formats (other than HTML) that the document must compile to in order for
it to be published.

- where to send bugs related to documentation (to the package? to the
www site?)

- procedure of inclusion of documents in the DDP CVS server (what to edit,
what to add and what to change) (not really policy but should be added)

I have a draft of proposal to remove the current policy and add a new one
which should close this bug. Will post more info when it's complete.

Regards

	Javi

PS: Most of this information is under 'issues' and 'ideas' in the
www.debian.org/ddp pages but it's been a long time and the current policy
has not  changed for a long time.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux avalon 2.4.18 #1 SMP mié abr 3 12:47:49 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello,

Bug #147164 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository.
You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/commit/a2cb11d8e66440363a2943e61fc593d3f6525dbe

------------------------------------------------------------------------
remove DDP policy, Closes: #147164
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/147164

--- End Message ---
Reply to: