[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#629487: marked as done ([www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: Wrong/outdated contents filelist (sid+wheezy i386, ntfs-3g))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2016 02:19:35 +0200
with message-id <CAOSaayVs8ESxz7u5m=-M3OnkUABdvp46H3Pgo47RCdvBDZiOhg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #573797,
regarding [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: Wrong/outdated contents filelist (sid+wheezy i386, ntfs-3g)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
573797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The files list for ntfs-3g at http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/ntfs-3g/filelist is outdated by 10 days, or at least wrong. ntfsprogs and ntfs-3g were merged so ntfs-3g now includes binaries from ntfsprogs such as ntfsfix, which is not reflected in the list. ntfs-3g just migrated to testing and the list is still outdated.
This is misleading because there is no hint the list may be outdated. No version information is shown, except in the page that links to the list, where the version is up-to-date.
This is probably the same issue as the one reported in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573797 for squeeze.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I believe this was fixed with

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/webwml/packages.git/commit/?id=864f512550c778b02b409dd94859ce6539dc62f3

by Simon Paillard.

Regards,
  Frank

-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

--- End Message ---
Reply to: