Bug#783655: www.debian.org: addition of ppc64el page to ports

[ferseiti@br.ibm.com]

Hi Paul.
Thank you for your input.

paul.is.wise@gmail.com wrote on 01/05/2015 03:17:49:

> For most other ports, the port names for a "family" of ports all
> redirect to a single page, for example amrhf/arm64/armel all redirect
> to the arm page. I wonder if that would be appropriate for
> powerpc/ppc64el/powerpcspe?
I can try and integrate what I have sent with powerpc page.
I am not sure about powerpcspe though, because it already has a whole page 
of
its own. Also it is an unofficial port (not that this really matters 
here).

> I would recommend not hard-coding the list of porterbox names, that
> sort of information is liable to get out of date. Indeed, there is
> also plummer.d.o now in addition to pastel.d.n.
How would you suggest it to be done? A contact point maybe?

Thanks and regards.

--
Fernando Seiti Furusato
Software Engineer
IBM Brazil - Linux Technology Center