[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#585033: marked as done (www.debian.org: intro/about improperly mentions the Hurd as the 'primary' non-Linux kernel)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:59:45 -0400
with message-id <5248B0E1.10602@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#585033: www.debian.org: intro/about improperly mentions the Hurd as the 'primary' non-Linux kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #585033,
regarding www.debian.org: intro/about improperly mentions the Hurd as the 'primary' non-Linux kernel
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
585033: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585033
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Here's the current text (http://www.debian.org/intro/about.en.html):

    Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel. Linux is a piece of software 
    started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers 
    worldwide.

    However, work is in progress to provide Debian for other kernels, primarily 
    for the Hurd.

The kFreeBSD port seems quite more alive to me than Debian/Hurd. Perhaps it 
deserves a mention as the 'primary' non-Linux Debian port?


Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 29/09/2013 18:37, Laura Arjona a écrit :

> I think the current text includes the petition so this bug report can be closed.

Agreed, thanks for looking into it and for your analysis. Do not
hesitate to close this kind of bug yourself in the future (bugs can be
reopened in case of a mistake).

Regards

David


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSSLDgAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08eHAH/j65x6X/fToGbR9inh+fZglR
XjqRmf7ytQEvXHpHdn8CvHrxWBxX8NsQj4vYIK+jH5Sn2jqiBxbK2hzPOhRjJlUW
zenqc7z+EpVsDJwtaCsQLkdZOgoR4nv2/dSIBDNgFlbVSFVhRBOWbd6h/Qb+Y6Tc
PjS5BPg0RzmpevXoRGSZZ8+l3qtkN0W3GmlghzBVhpPwnZNutqKRgkardXOWR5YV
IOVH4q9iU5PC6y90PmMPAldw7QxpvLNfIq12k3nmQgSU7gZKp3hURjVmE+z03mHT
TFPuYnYX26+pvkJetDyL1sjn+T64tngLW2IdNR9miZzpSM1LG2E2c2VTRIcJLHQ=
=v+kh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: