Changings in tech-ctte
Hi all,
sorry, what's the rationale for this cosmetic
(formatting only) changes, breaking translations unnecessarily:
--- tech-ctte.wml 2013/02/25 19:47:59 1.57
+++ tech-ctte.wml 2013/02/27 16:55:57 1.58
@@ -119,57 +119,57 @@
<ul>
<li>2012-12-21
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/688772";>Bug #688772:</a>The committee overrules the dependency of meta-gnome on
-network-manager while concerns raised in <a
-href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834#273";>§4 of the decision in
-#681834</a> remain unaddressed.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/688772";>Bug #688772</a>:
+ The committee overrules the dependency of meta-gnome
+ on network-manager while concerns raised in <a
+ href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834#273";>§4 of the
+ decision in #681834</a> remain unaddressed.</li>
<li>2012-10-05
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/573745";>Bug #573745</a>: The
- committee declines to change the maintainer of python packages in
- Debian.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/573745";>Bug #573745</a>:
+ The committee declines to change the maintainer
+ of python packages in Debian.</li>
<li>2012-09-14
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834";>Bug #681834</a>: gnome-core
- should Recommends: network-manager; override maintainer.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834";>Bug #681834</a>: gnome-core
+ should Recommends: network-manager; override maintainer.</li>
<li>2012-08-24
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681783";>Bug #681783</a>:
- Policy on Recommends is correct; Recommends is fine in metapackages.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681783";>Bug #681783</a>: Policy on
+ Recommends is correct; Recommends is fine in metapackages.</li>
<li>2012-08-14
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681687";>Bug #681687</a>:
- evince's lack of mime type entry for PDF is RC bug
- (decline to overrule release team).</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681687";>Bug #681687</a>:
+ evince's lack of mime type entry for PDF is RC bug
+ (decline to overrule release team).</li>
<li>2012-07-12
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/614907";>Bug #614907</a>: nodejs must
- use /usr/bin/nodejs, node must change to ax25-node and provide
- /usr/sbin/ax25-node, and transition packages and legacy packages
- defined.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/614907";>Bug #614907</a>:
+ nodejs must use /usr/bin/nodejs, node must change
+ to ax25-node and provide /usr/sbin/ax25-node, and
+ transition packages and legacy packages defined.</li>
<li>2012-04-05
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/640874";>Bug #640874</a>: decline to
- override policy maintainers. debian/rules must be a Makefile.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/640874";>Bug #640874</a>: decline to
+ override policy maintainers. debian/rules must be a Makefile.</li>
<li>2012-03-21
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/629385";>Bug #629385</a>:
- dpkg-buildpackage will implement build-arch testing using make
- -qn.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/629385";>Bug #629385</a>:
+ dpkg-buildpackage will implement build-arch testing using make -qn.</li>
<li>2012-02-27
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/607368";>Bug #607368</a>: decline to
- override the kernel maintainer team's ABI numbering policy.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/607368";>Bug #607368</a>: decline to
+ override the kernel maintainer team's ABI numbering policy.</li>
<li>2012-02-05
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/658341";>Bug #658341</a>: multi-arch
- enabled dpkg may be uploaded to experimental and unstable by Raphaël
- Hertzog without waiting for primary maintainer code review.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/658341";>Bug #658341</a>: multi-arch
+ enabled dpkg may be uploaded to experimental and unstable by Raphaël
+ Hertzog without waiting for primary maintainer code review.</li>
<li>2010-12-01
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/587886";>Bug #587886</a>: lilo
- should remain in unstable. Matt Arnold and Joachim Wiedorn are to
- be joint maintainers of lilo.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/587886";>Bug #587886</a>:
+ lilo should remain in unstable. Matt Arnold and Joachim
+ Wiedorn are to be joint maintainers of lilo.</li>
<li>2009-09-04
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/535645";>Bug #535645</a>: decline to
- override ftp team's removal of ia32-libs-tools; reaffirm ftp team's
- ability to remove packages; recommend clarification of
- reasons for removal, and mechanism of reintroduction to the
- archive.</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/535645";>Bug #535645</a>:
+ decline to override ftp team's removal of ia32-libs-tools;
+ reaffirm ftp team's ability to remove packages;
+ recommend clarification of reasons for removal,
+ and mechanism of reintroduction to the archive.</li>
<li>2009-08-27
- <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/510415";>Bug #510415</a>: allow Qmail
- into Debian after fixing delayed-bounce issue with RC bug to block
- transition for one month</li>
+ <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/510415";>Bug #510415</a>:
+ allow Qmail into Debian after fixing delayed-bounce
+ issue with RC bug to block transition for one month</li>
<li>2009-07-30
<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/539158";>Bug #539158</a>: refuse to
override udev maintainer; printf suggested to be documented as a
--
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 3.0.2
under D e b i a n G N U / L I N U X 6.0 ( S q u e e z e )
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://linuxcounter.net/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Reply to: