[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#277815: marked as done (please reference wnpp explanation from bugs page)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:15:01 -0400
with message-id <4EEA5545.7010703@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Re: Bug#277815: wnpp on bugs page
has caused the Debian Bug report #277815,
regarding please reference wnpp explanation from bugs page
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
277815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=277815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

The wnpp page [1] doesn't seem to be linked to anywhere from the bugs [2] page.
Please include a link to it from the top/documentation section of the page.

Thanks,
*t

[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Context: linking the wnpp page [1] the bugs [2] page.
[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/

Hi,

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:59:33 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:33 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> Well, I'm just thinking the link could be added to the Supplementary
>> Information section with a text like 'The current list of the
>> Work-Needing and Prospective Packages'. Nothin else.
>>
>> I'm just saying since wnpp is a pseudo-package in BTS, it could be
>> exactly a _supplementary information_ to be added on the BTS page. Of
>> course it is not a main information, it could be even added on a
>> probably new heading like 'Related BTS information'.
>>
>> wnpp is related to BTS and it is not referred from the BTS page section.
> 
> Hello, owner@bugs.debian.org,
> 
> I would like to see if there is not objection in your part by adding a
> wnpp link to the Supplementary Information on the main Bugs page. tbm
> suggested to ask you too.
> 
> There is no objection from Frank (adding it to the Supplementary
> Information).
> 
> I know this may not be a big deal, but I'm trying to solve or push bugs
> against www.debian.org.

Same here: since there was no answer (nor action) for almost seven
years, and since the wnpp purpose is a bit different IMHO, I'm closing
this bug. I'm anyway CCing debian-qa also in charge of www.d.o/wnpp in
case someone may have another opinion (in such case, please reopen the
bug and eventually propose a patch so we can fix it the other way around).

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: