[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: po4a website broken?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

[ Chris, CCing you: not sure you're subscribed to the list, apologies if
so ]

Hi,

Transferring this request to the i18n list for the developers-reference
issue.

Le 13/09/2011 14:59, Chris Leick a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I've noticed, that the german po4a website
> (http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po4a/de.de.html) is outdated.
> 
> e.g. are the following packages marked as untranslated:
> developers-reference (see #623489)

The developers-reference is already translated in French for quite a
long time too, and is not available either on the related page [1],
maybe just need to be triggered on i18n side?

1: http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po4a/fr

> emdebian-crush (see #624619)

The PO file is not in emdebian-crush source package either, so the
webpage seems accurate:
$ ls emdebian-crush-2.2.17/doc/po
emdebian-crush.pot

Furthermore, the #624619 bug seems about the program translation (not
the *documentation* translation), which seems almost complete [2].

2: http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/de#emdebian-crush

> The partially translated packages aren't up to date too:
> emdebian-grip (see #624617)

It's not up to date in the package either, so the webpage seems accurate
too:
$ LANG=de_DE.utf8 msgfmt -vv emdebian-grip-3.0.7/doc/po/de.po
emdebian-grip-3.0.7/doc/po/de.po: 520 übersetzte Meldungen, 33 ungenaue
Übersetzungen, 50 unübersetzte Meldungen.

> apt (see #629949)
> multistrap (see #616527)
> etc.

Didn't look at them yet, but could you please first check if the file
included in the package is up to date (regarding the previous ones, the
problem seems to be package-side instead of being web-side ;-).

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=3/C5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: