[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#357304: marked as done (www.debian.org: devel/testing should be updated for BTS version tracking?)

Your message dated Wed, 4 May 2011 19:13:04 -0400
with message-id <201105041913.04890.david@tilapin.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#357304: www.debian.org: devel/testing should be updated for BTS version tracking?
has caused the Debian Bug report #357304,
regarding www.debian.org: devel/testing should be updated for BTS version tracking?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
357304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package:	www.debian.org
Severity:	normal
File:		http://www.us.debian.org/devel/testing

I find that the following is incomprehensible, and I suspect that it
is outdated, now that bts version tracking is implemented.

| The "testing" bug count for a package is considered to be roughly
| the bug count at the last point when the "testing" version equalled
| the "unstable" version. The bugs tagged sarge or etch will not be
| counted.  Bugs with the sid tag will be counted, though.

If this is trying to say what it would make sense to say, then what
happens nowadays is trivial:

  The testing bug count for a package is considered to be the number
  of bugs which apply to the version of that package in testing.

and IMHO isn't even worth saying.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Le jeudi 16 mars 2006 15:11:10, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:00:10PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> > > I find that the following is incomprehensible, and I suspect that it
> > > is outdated, now that bts version tracking is implemented.
> > 
> > It is implemented in the BTS, however to the best of my knowledge
> > britney has not yet been updated to understand version tracking (cc-ed
> > to aj for confirmation).
> 
> Ah, yes, so #357304 and #339552 are both presently "noatbug" in
> documentation only; (knew I'd seen this before..)

Since #339552 has been fixed in the Developers' Reference some years ago, it's 
not too late to update the website too and close this bug report.

Regards

David

--- End Message ---
Reply to: