On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:37:40PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi list, > > at http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100730 > > Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conference > > No, it's "Eleventh" - since first debconf was debconf*0*... > http://debconf0.debconf.org/ Hi, Sorry to reopen this thread but I read http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100730 and see that it is now titled as "2010 Annual Debian Conference". FWIW I'm fine with whatever form we use. Is this the agreed-on name? Should I then change the Project History document to make it consistent? I recently added more information on the Debian conferences in that document, see, for example, the references to Debconf at http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-detailed.en.html#s4.4 or http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-detailed.en.html#s4.6, and would like to avoid getting a bug in the near future related to the Debconf naming. Best regards, Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature