Debian Constitution: supercede or supersede?
Hi,
I wonder about the usage of supercede. Is it OK to replace it by (or with :-?)
supersede?
http://dict.leo.org/forum/viewUnsolvedquery.php?idThread=315841&idForum=1&lp=ende&lang=de
contains a discussion which indicates that "supersede" is never wrong whereas
"supercede" *could* be considered as typo.
$ grep -ri supercede english/
english/security/2008/dsa-1662.wml:DSA-1608-1. This new update supercedes that fix and mitigates both
english/devel/constitution.1.2.wml:That was superceded by the <a href="constitution">current version, 1.4</a>
english/devel/constitution.1.0.wml:That was superceded by the <a href="constitution">current version</a>
english/devel/constitution.1.3.wml:That was superceded by the <a href="constitution">current version, 1.4</a>
english/devel/constitution.1.1.wml:That was superceded by the <a href="constitution">current version, 1.4</a>
Jens
Reply to: