On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:05:11AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Rhonda, > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:54:48AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 13:48 -0500 schrieb Kumar Appaiah: > > > Please do include a description of "armel" on the > > > http://www.debian.org/ports/ page, in lieu of the "ARM EABI Port" at > > > the bottom (port-like projects section). > Sure. I have CC'ed Riku. But my point is just that the word "armel" > appears appears nowhere on the ports page itself. But if it's fine > with the porters, it's fine with me too. Maybe we should add armel to the ports page in the same way mips and mipsel pages are? RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/ports/index.wml,v retrieving revision 1.79 diff -u -r1.79 index.wml --- index.wml 20 Oct 2007 10:36:19 -0000 1.79 +++ index.wml 27 Sep 2008 12:44:22 -0000 @@ -93,10 +93,12 @@ on the CHRP and PReP open architecture machines. </p> -<h3><a href="arm/">ARM (<q>arm</q>)</a></h3> +<h3><a href="arm/">ARM (<q>arm</q> and <q>armel</q>)</a></h3> <p> First officially released with Debian 2.2. This port runs on a variety of embedded hardware, including the NSLU2. + Armel is the more efficient successor for the "arm" port, which is + compatible with the ARM EABI. </p> <h3><a href="mips/">MIPS CPUs (<q>mips</q> and <q>mipsel</q>)</a></h3> -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature