Bug#471743: marked as done (Please update CreativeCommons v3 )
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:28:11 +0000
with message-id <47e6932b.uddlI4WCfgnd0qNJ%mjr@phonecoop.coop>
and subject line Re: Bug#471743: Please update CreativeCommons v3
has caused the Debian Bug report #471743,
regarding Please update CreativeCommons v3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
471743: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471743
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please update website[1] with recent resolutions about CC v3.0[2]
Thanks!
1. http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
2. http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#Debian
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#head-6c657384a8f1ddd803438e69f176f8d0c479ab9c
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH4YL0GcNpEq4d/XQRAt/rAJ9UOYzzWYv0GpI3o9ydh5Z/sE2kZgCfY6oy
mePosOXV3tWPLsM1V4s5hV8=
=LFcH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
UlisesVitulli <uvitulli@fi.uba.ar> wrote:
> Please update website[1] with recent resolutions about CC v3.0[2]
>
> Thanks!
>
> 1. http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
> 2. http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#Debian
> http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#head-6c657384a8f1ddd803438e69f176f8d0c479ab9c
There is no resolution about CC v3.0, so there is nothing to add to
the website about it yet. Closing this specific bug report.
CreativeCommons's decision to reject the request for format
non-discrimination was disappointing and the way they rejected it was
shameful. For a contemporary response, see
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2006/cc#tpmcc
The unsupported claim on wiki.debian.org is also disappointing
Hope that explains,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
--- End Message ---
Reply to: