Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:45:22 +0100 with message-id <200803031145.22682.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#468765: Should the Debian project state it is proud of oldstable security support? has caused the Debian Bug report #468765, regarding security support termination announcements are "too proud" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 468765: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468765 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: security support termination announcements are "too proud"
- From: Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 03:47:27 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200803010347.27237.chealer@gmail.com>
Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor According to http://www.us.debian.org/News/2008/20080229 One year after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 alias 'etch' and nearly three years after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 alias 'sarge' the security support for the old distribution (3.1 alias 'sarge') is coming to an end next month. The Debian project is proud to be able to support its old distribution for such a long time and even for one year after a new version has been released. Saying that "The Debian project is proud to be able to..." is useless so it presumably means to imply that the oldstable has a long security support. But that support is of 1 year or less, while some other distros do much better. For (good) example, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux Red Hat commits to supporting each version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux for 7 years after its release. Since Red Hat releases at least each 3 years, that means Red Hat commits to supporting its "oldstables" for at least 4 years, which is much more than 1 year. IMO, more than 4 years is too much. But comparing to that, it's hard to be proud of under 1 year. IMO it's OK, but not more.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 468765-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#468765: Should the Debian project state it is proud of oldstable security support?
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:45:22 +0100
- Message-id: <200803031145.22682.holger@layer-acht.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080303061456.GA21681@steve.org.uk>
- References: <[🔎] 200803022031.16291.chealer@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080303061456.GA21681@steve.org.uk>
Thanks for playing.Attachment: pgpYfCCT7OWFx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---