Le dimanche 24 juin 2007, Adam D. Barratt écrivit : > On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:59 +0200, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: > > Sorry, I'm going to revert this change so, but I don't understand the > > meaning of this sentense. Please Don, could you explain in other words > > what this command does so I can translate this correctly into French. [...] > It's now possible to unarchive a bug using the new "unarchive" command. > One can also re-archive such a bug using "archive" which will > immediately return the bug's state to "archived", assuming it still > meets the criteria usually applied for archiving (with the exception > that any time-based criteria are ignored). > > One cannot, however, use "archive" to archive a bug that has not > previously been archived. The first archiving of a bug will occur when > it meets the BTS' criteria for doing so, and cannot be forced to occur > at an earlier time. > > The wording of Nicolas's change does not differentiate between the case > of a bug that has been unarchived using "unarchive" and a bug that has > never been archived before. I assume that's what Don is objecting to - > "archive" can only be used to /re/-archive a previously archived bug. Thanks, maybe we could make this sentence better as other people may ask for explaination: <dd> Re-archives a bug that has been unarchived manualy using the <code>unarchive</code> command if the bug fulfills the requirements for archival, ignoring time. </dd> -- .~. Nicolas Bertolissio /V\ nico.bertol@free.fr // \\ /( )\ ^`~'^ Debian GNU-Linux
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature