[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#284082: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2



Here is the same patch, but this time against the website cvs.

Vince

Index: webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -r1.61 errata.wml
--- webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml	3 Dec 2004 18:20:04 -0000	1.61
+++ webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml	4 Dec 2004 06:43:20 -0000
@@ -46,8 +46,24 @@
 	<li><b>LVM failure on Sparc32 (at least).</b>
 	If you want to create LVM volume groups, the physical volumes must not
 	reside at the beginning of the disk, or else activating new logical
-	volumes within the volume group will fail. This is due to some
-	unforeseen quirks in Sun disk labels.
+	volumes within the volume group will fail.
+	<p>
+	This happens because the Sun disk label resides at the beginning
+	of the disk and the first partition may start from the beginning
+	of the disk. Hence the partition table becomes part of the first
+	partition. Most file systems are smart enough not to write data
+	at the start of their partition (which in this case clobbers the
+	partition table). Two important types of partition where data
+	<em>will</em> be written to the start of the partion are the physical
+	volumes for LVM or RAID, and swap space.
+	</p>
+	<p>
+	Therefore, on Sparc32 (at least) users may <strong>not</strong> create
+	swap space partitions, or partitions for LVM or RAID, at the
+	<em>beginning</em> of the disk. If users do this, the partition table
+	will subsequently be completely erased when the partition is used,
+	for example when booting a freshly installed system.
+	</p>
 	</li>
 	<li><b>2.6 install have the potential to mess up Windows partitioning.</b>
 	The fixes of the 2.6 CHS issue in parted are apparently

Reply to: