Re: web and ftp mirroring [was Jay's site organization plan]
- To: "James A. Treacy" <treacy@debian.org>
- Cc: bruce@va.debian.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org, ezanardi@ull.es, tps@users.buoy.com
- Subject: Re: web and ftp mirroring [was Jay's site organization plan]
- From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@feedback.net.ar>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 19:12:39 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980223191239.28833@feedback.net.ar>
- Mail-followup-to: "James A. Treacy" <treacy@debian.org>, bruce@va.debian.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org, ezanardi@ull.es, tps@users.buoy.com
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] m0y73nu-000DHYC@landru.math.uwaterloo.ca>; from James A. Treacy on Mon, Feb 23, 1998 at 02:44:42PM -0500
- References: <[🔎] 19980223063050.63341@feedback.net.ar> <[🔎] m0y73nu-000DHYC@landru.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Idea:
Currently we use the www. prefix to indicate the protocol used to access
the site. This is trivial because anyone can install and deinstall servers
very quickly. Why don't we use a prefix to indicate which type of content a
server is carrying? Like...
www.XX.debian.org for the WWW site
and
dist.XX.debian.org for the distribution
This way we can have much more flexibility. Is it worth?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-www-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: